GpK tournament.... LOL

First Riot Post
Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

DepressiveMan

Senior Member

03-20-2010

Poor l0cust... Everybody hates him now..


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

SMOKE BOWLS 420

This user has referred a friend to League of Legends, click for more information

Member

03-20-2010

Quote:
Originally Posted by SamSmitty View Post
Even if it wasen't in the rules, to take a autowin in the finals is pretty low, especially on a random disconnect.
This is what I was thinking. Why would you take the win instead of replaying? Why would you want to win like that? I don't think anyone is going to remember L0cust as the winner of the tournament, but as the ******bag who took a win on a technicality instead of playing the match. That's ignoring the fact that the rules say d/c = remake and not autoloss.


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Messiah

The Council

03-20-2010

Quote:
Originally Posted by DepressiveMan View Post
Poor l0cust... Everybody hates him now..
i hope they do
normally you look up to top tier players for playing fair
but i guess locust isn't in that group anymore


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

UnOfficial

Senior Member

03-20-2010

Quote:
Originally Posted by Messiah View Post
i hope they do
normally you look up to top tier players for playing fair
but i guess locust isn't in that group anymore

Exactly,

L0CUST failure

wow locust 2 syllable

failure 2 syllable

wooaahh


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

cFangNasty

The Council

03-20-2010

Yay more drama for the LoL forums...can't believe that happened


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

LiterallyAPanda

This user has referred a friend to League of Legends, click for more information

Recruiter

03-20-2010

Rules are rules...

Unless (this is typical for competitive video games) both teams agree that a "violation" of the rules should be overlooked, especially if it's pretty clear the intent of the rule (in this case to prevent rune switching) wasn't the actual reason for the rules violation.


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Reppuken

Senior Member

03-20-2010

I suggest that we make a replacement tier list since he's out!

Tier 1: MUNDO WILL RANK WHERE HE PLEASES
Trash: Everyone else


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Burbs

This user has referred a friend to League of Legends, click for more information

Senior Member

03-20-2010

Can't believe l0cust dodged.


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

MEMEME670

This user has referred a friend to League of Legends, click for more information

Senior Member

03-20-2010

Everyone's hating on L0cust.

How many have no reason to rage, and saw the whole thing?


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

lordhomercat

This user has referred a friend to League of Legends, click for more information

Junior Member

03-20-2010

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mitsuru Pandachi View Post
Rules are rules...

Unless (this is typical for competitive video games) both teams agree that a "violation" of the rules should be overlooked, especially if it's pretty clear the intent of the rule (in this case to prevent rune switching) wasn't the actual reason for the rules violation.
What rule are you talking about? Link? Quote? There's no rule against leaving the game in picks or champ select or any time really except after game starts. Maybe if there actually was a rule against it, this would actually make sense?