I know 500 may be a little harsh but smurf or not chances are if you have 500 games you've at least got to learn something and put some time into learning what not to do.
Also, less smurfs to boost their ELO e-peen.
500? A bit harsh. 300 bare minimum though. Not like this would ever happen because it might shove some people away. Thoughts?
normal games are just for practice anyways, and your restricting peoples options. Im sure that will go over well...
It takes about 100 games to get to level 30 in the first place.
This is a really stupid idea. You can downvote me if you want, but riots never gonna do this.
I'd be in 100% full support, it'd stop scumbag smurfs and ******* from playing ranked i dont see a downside. and i think it'd be either 700 GAMES or 350+ wins.
I like 250ish. I personally started ranked at 300 and started out in 1370.
Very yes. 500 games at least before doing any kind of ranked. Makes perfect sense to me
I'd say 300 wins before you can play ranked. Or if that's too harsh then 250.
Rawr Poptart Cat
not 500 games, but 250 wins. This way, if you're truly ready for ranked, you'll be able to join in ranked quicker
250 games minimum, increase the amount of champions needed as well.
i have like 10 diamond 1 friends on my list without under 250 normal wins
experience and skill arent the same thing
and if your goal is to remove all the "bad" players from ranked, then all you do is make the decent players bronze 5 now
© 2013 Riot Games, Inc. All rights reserved. Riot Games, League of Legends and PvP.net are trademarks, services marks, or registered trademarks of Riot Games, Inc.