Welcome to the Forum Archive!

Years of conversation fill a ton of digital pages, and we've kept all of it accessible to browse or copy over. Whether you're looking for reveal articles for older champions, or the first time that Rammus rolled into an "OK" thread, or anything in between, you can find it here. When you're finished, check out the boards to join in the latest League of Legends discussions.

GO TO BOARDS


Can we get a better european team to replace wolves? o_O

123
Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

ArcNight

Senior Member

02-23-2013

They kinda lucked out in quarterfinal matches against Millenium with new lineup , where Angush failed and feed top. There are at least 3-4 other teams who would've done better in tourney , like Alternate with all those near 3k elo players , they got strong group also fnatic in quarters , and in losing bracket giants, so unlucky oponents , MYM , same Millenium


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Dalze

Senior Member

02-23-2013

Quote:
Lïcht:
Wolves > NA teams.


While I don't agree with the OP, I don't agree with this either. Wolves might be better than the bottom 3 NA teams, but I highly doubt they can win a red hot Curse or even the out of shape CLG and TSM.


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Sagovirus

Senior Member

02-23-2013

Quote:
ArcNight:
They kinda lucked out in quarterfinal matches against Millenium with new lineup , where Angush failed and feed top. There are at least 3-4 other teams who would've done better in tourney , like Alternate with all those near 3k elo players , they got strong group also fnatic in quarters , and in losing bracket giants, so unlucky oponents , MYM , same Millenium


Honestly, MYM and Millenium were stronger than Wolves and should have been the last qualified.

Both Wolves and Dragonborns "lucked out" :
- Wolves by getting favourable groups and tree, while having Millenium throwing and screwing it up
- DB by being insanely focused and not making any mistake, playing a good 50% above what they were showing a month before

but Wolves are still more than decent, and better than the vast majority of the LCS NA teams, they just aren't facing the same opponents, theirs are FAR harder and FAR better that things like Vulcan/GGU/MRN/Team Solo Trash/CLG - we haven't done good in over a year and so on.


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Halcione

Senior Member

02-23-2013

wasn't vulcun like 0-5 for a while? Then they got a win in and started steamrolling; now they are impressing everyone and their pet hamster?

Sht happens. Doesn't mean they are bad, they just had a bad streak. Give them time and they make something work.


123