Welcome to the Forum Archive!

Years of conversation fill a ton of digital pages, and we've kept all of it accessible to browse or copy over. Whether you're looking for reveal articles for older champions, or the first time that Rammus rolled into an "OK" thread, or anything in between, you can find it here. When you're finished, check out the boards to join in the latest League of Legends discussions.

GO TO BOARDS


Fix THIS - img inside

1
Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

rotacioskapa

Member

10-28-2010

why is LoL eating my memory?
Image (http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/8899/lolftt.png)


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Feral Renegade

Senior Member

10-28-2010

45% is relatively low. It just means that nothing else in your computer is running at a higher priority, and as such, LoL is allocated a large share of CPU. Because of this, it runs rather quickly. Not a bug, just the way it works.


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

rotacioskapa

Member

10-28-2010

Quote:
Feral Renegade:
45% is relatively low. It just means that nothing else in your computer is running at a higher priority, and as such, LoL is allocated a large share of CPU. Because of this, it runs rather quickly. Not a bug, just the way it works.


watch the memory usage... 480000k is usual?
this is how it works?
than riot messed up something in programming


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Defrocked

Member

10-28-2010

windows xp!


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Lazurea

Senior Member

10-28-2010

Windows XP sucks, it's a 9 year old OS now.

That said, 400mb doesn't sound abnormal for a game like this.


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Feral Renegade

Senior Member

10-28-2010

Quote:
Lazurea:
Windows XP sucks, it's a 9 year old OS now.

That said, 400mb doesn't sound abnormal for a game like this.


^this

Its how it works. get over it lol.


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Lamda

Member

10-28-2010

Windows xp is still more efficent memory wise than any other microsoft follow up like vista or 7. So shush fanboys. You can run xp with only 128 ram. Vista and 7 with less than 2gb runs like ****.


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Byerley

Senior Member

10-28-2010

I recall WC3 eating about 700,000 at times.


1