Punish spam increasing accuracy? Doubtful.

12345 ... 7
Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Kirska

Senior Member

01-16-2013

I don't know why we are seeing so many posts that claim for high accuracy just spam punish.

This is my justice review first page right now. I highlighted the only 3 cases that I've missed on the page, and if you look, they're all cases where I clicked punish and was incorrect.

If you do the math, not counting the skips, my accuracy as is was 15 out of 18, that's 83%.

If I had clicked punish on every case I didn't skip, my accuracy would be 14 out of 18, that's 77%.

If I had clicked punish on every case including those I skipped, my accuracy would be 19 out of 25, that's 76%.

In short, the more punishes, the less accurate I would be. I realize this is just one small sample, but it is a completely random sample, and pretty on par with what I normally see. So yeah, I don't get why this is such a common stance to take...

Edit: Sorry the image is really small, here's a better copy: http://imageshack.us/a/img145/8673/capture2kb.png


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

A Nerdy Fat Kid

Member

01-16-2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirska View Post
I don't know why we are seeing so many posts that claim for high accuracy just spam punish.

This is my justice review first page right now. I highlighted the only 3 cases that I've missed on the page, and if you look, they're all cases where I clicked punish and was incorrect.

If you do the math, not counting the skips, my accuracy as is was 15 out of 18, that's 83%.

If I had clicked punish on every case I didn't pardon, my accuracy would be 14 out of 18, that's 77%.

If I had clicked punish on every case including those I skipped, my accuracy would be 19 out of 25, that's 76%.

In short, the more punishes, the less accurate I would be. I realize this is just one small sample, but it is a completely random sample, and pretty on par with what I normally see. So yeah, I don't get why this is such a common stance to take...

tell me this isnt punish spam

http://na.leagueoflegends.com/tribun.../6059491/#nogo


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Kirska

Senior Member

01-16-2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by A Nerdy Fat Kid View Post
Please explain how this is at all relevant to my post.


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Mauru

Member

01-16-2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by A Nerdy Fat Kid View Post
Gragas [00:19:30] fiddle this ur first time playing that champ?
Fiddlesticks [00:19:35] no?
Gragas [00:19:42] seems like it
Fiddlesticks [00:19:47] cool story bro
Gragas [00:19:55] true story breh
Gragas [00:20:56] omg you guys are bad

Gragas [00:23:51] how are you guys so bad with those op champs?
Gragas [00:23:56] i mean really guys come on

Singed [00:15:14] wont help me then **** it
Warwick [00:15:46] we kind of have our own stuff going on singed
Singed [00:16:33] ww youre supposed to help gank top so that it can be pushed quickly freeign up the jungle and tank
Singed [00:16:40] learn to play jungle if thats what ur gonna do
Warwick [00:17:02] i dont have to do it every single second, and besides that i was trying to help kat get away from nasus
Singed [00:18:24] wow man kat youre a horrible players
Singed [00:18:27] you to teemo

Singed [00:29:01] Kat been playing this game way to long man, troll someone else
Singed [00:29:10] youre reported for feeding and griefing
Singed [00:29:16] youre a cancer on this community

Irony.


Thanks for proving the OP's point. Really appreciate it.


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Shelzin

Senior Member

01-16-2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by A Nerdy Fat Kid View Post
That's not punish spam. I would have punished that.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wui-PNqJrxs


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Fudouri

Senior Member

01-16-2013

Random chance.

So, it has been mostly found (though not in last month) that Tribunal has about a 80% punish rate.

So, anyone voting would fall on a bell curve around 80% punish rate. Some higher, some lower. Its possible to get 10 punish cases in a row is 10.7%. For 20 punish cases in a row is 1.1%.

The difference between you and the people posting is that you understand the "small sample size" problem.


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

170 Calories

Senior Member

01-16-2013

Mine is the same as yours. A mix of punish skip and pardons. No spamming
http://na.leagueoflegends.com/tribun...tice-review/1/


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Shelzin

Senior Member

01-16-2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by 170 Calories View Post
Mine is the same as yours. A mix of punish skip and pardons. No spamming
http://na.leagueoflegends.com/tribun...tice-review/1/
lol

Anyone that clicks on the link is going to see their own tribunal rating... Just a heads up.


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Enterti

Senior Member

01-16-2013

The spam punish thing can be traced back to the original tribunal infographic which stated a 95% punish rate(mind you this was back when intentional feeding was present in about half of the games played). Currently in the NA Tribunal the rates are close to 80% punish based on a few datamines that have been used.

Anyone still claiming punish spam is using out of date statistics or misreading the current ones.

EDIT: here is that infographic btw http://images.wikia.com/leagueoflege...c_Tribunal.jpg


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Noxian Zell

Senior Member

01-16-2013

The thing is that there will be some days where maybe 19/20 cases are punishable. Rarely the other way around


12345 ... 7