Welcome to the Forum Archive!

Years of conversation fill a ton of digital pages, and we've kept all of it accessible to browse or copy over. Whether you're looking for reveal articles for older champions, or the first time that Rammus rolled into an "OK" thread, or anything in between, you can find it here. When you're finished, check out the boards to join in the latest League of Legends discussions.

GO TO BOARDS


Karma 100% win rate

1
Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

eBlossom

Senior Member

11-11-2012

http://www.lolking.net/charts?region=na&league=platinum&type=champion-winrate&range=daily

so OP

FOTM inc


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

NotBuzzJack

Senior Member

11-11-2012

Small sample size.


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Rauschen

Senior Member

11-11-2012

Quote:
NotBuzzJack:
Small sample size.


Woosh


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

eBlossom

Senior Member

11-11-2012

Quote:
NotBuzzJack:
Small sample size.


.


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Krebstar

Senior Member

11-11-2012

Yeah, but then people try so use this as a reason win rate is never a meaningful statistic, which is the real error of judgment.


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Ankokukai

Senior Member

11-11-2012

you should have saved this for when someone says Katarina or Rengar are OP because X win rate
then you counter with "Karma has 100%, nerf her"


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Krebstar

Senior Member

11-11-2012

Quote:
Ankokukai:
you should have saved this for when someone says Katarina or Rengar are OP because X win rate
then you counter with "Karma has 100%, nerf her"


Didn't see this coming...lol.

Also, click the link and try to find Karma (hint: it's in the "lowest win%" plot)


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

eBlossom

Senior Member

11-11-2012

The idiocy of the forums is clearly demonstrated by the downvotes and responses to this thread.


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Krebstar

Senior Member

11-11-2012

Well, you responded, didn't you?

Anyway, as a joke it's stale at best. As an implication that win rate is a bad statistic, possibly in reply to the Kat OP threads or others, you yourself are using a small sample size to argue that small sample size is a problem. Hell, the link doesn't even support your post anymore.


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Pomf Pomf Pomf

Senior Member

11-11-2012

this thread


most people in this thread


1