Welcome to the Forum Archive!

Years of conversation fill a ton of digital pages, and we've kept all of it accessible to browse or copy over. Whether you're looking for reveal articles for older champions, or the first time that Rammus rolled into an "OK" thread, or anything in between, you can find it here. When you're finished, check out the boards to join in the latest League of Legends discussions.

GO TO BOARDS


Old Archangels > Seraphs Embrace

1
Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

LegitKajit

Senior Member

11-10-2012

wow old archangels gave 1400 mana, this new Seraphs Embrace only give 1000..... HUGE hidden nerf to Ryze, probably not even viable anymore....

"OH MAN DAT PASSIVE OMG STRONGEST SHIELD IN THE GAME :DDD" who cares, it takes to much skill to pop an active in a teamfight anyways....

Quote:
Based Goggles:
It's also cheaper, and there will probably be other mana items to build now. And using an active isn't exactly hard.


LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!

If using an active isn't that hard, then why do you have to move your mouse all of the way down to the item. Why can't you just keybind it?!?!?


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Deceive or AFK

Member

11-10-2012

Troll post, downvote & move on. Please don't reply.


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Jamaree

Senior Member

11-10-2012

...So are you saying you lack the skill to use an active?


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

LegitKajit

Senior Member

11-10-2012

Quote:
DeciEVE or AFK:
Troll post, downvote & move on. Please don't reply.


It's not a troll post to those who actually use(d) Ryze....


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

TheWaveWizard

Senior Member

11-10-2012

It's also cheaper, and there will probably be other mana items to build now. And using an active isn't exactly hard.


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

YeIIowFlash

Junior Member

11-10-2012

if its not a troll post then he is not just stupid but brain dead

a caster who has archangel will have more then 2k mana around 2.5 or 3 item dependable
full mana start teamfight thats a shild for 1k-1,5k if you have resistence from ga or zhonyas then thats already op on every caster because that shild will give them more than enough time to get their spells rdy 1 or 2 times
ryze is already hard to kill but with a big shild like that 1 vs 5 incomming + his spell vamp just gg


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Deceive or AFK

Member

11-10-2012

Quote:
LegitKajit:
wow old archangels gave 1400 mana, this new Seraphs Embrace only give 1000..... HUGE hidden nerf to Ryze, probably not even viable anymore....

"OH MAN DAT PASSIVE OMG STRONGEST SHIELD IN THE GAME :DDD" who cares, it takes to much skill to pop an active in a teamfight anyways....

The very fact you actually completed arcangels on Ryze before finishing frozen/banshee/rod of ages means you are trolling.

The fact you're complaining about Arcangels being changed at all because there is no possible way it could be a worse item means you are trolling.

Ok bye.


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Jamaree

Senior Member

11-10-2012

Quote:
LegitKajit:

If using an active isn't that hard, then why do you have to move your mouse all of the way down to the item. Why can't you just keybind it?!?!?


...You ...you can keybind it?


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Color Deaf

Senior Member

11-10-2012

Quote:
LegitKajit:
wow old archangels gave 1400 mana, this new Seraphs Embrace only give 1000..... HUGE hidden nerf to Ryze, probably not even viable anymore....

"OH MAN DAT PASSIVE OMG STRONGEST SHIELD IN THE GAME :DDD" who cares, it takes to much skill to pop an active in a teamfight anyways....



LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!

If using an active isn't that hard, then why do you have to move your mouse all of the way down to the item. Why can't you just keybind it?!?!?


You can keybind it you moron. It's default bound to the numbers 1-6 labeled in the inventory as:
[1][2][3]
[4][5][6]


1