Welcome to the Forum Archive!

Years of conversation fill a ton of digital pages, and we've kept all of it accessible to browse or copy over. Whether you're looking for reveal articles for older champions, or the first time that Rammus rolled into an "OK" thread, or anything in between, you can find it here. When you're finished, check out the boards to join in the latest League of Legends discussions.

GO TO BOARDS


Control control control

1
Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Undefined

Recruiter

09-02-2009

I dont know if this is the proper place to post this but here is a problem im sure every one can appreciate. there are many times when one side is wining or one side is losing that members of the losing side decide to leave in the middle of the game. why not make those non-controlled champions controllable by players still in the game. once someone leaves dont add to their stats but allow the team to control the summoner so they dont get screwed for staying. this would not disrupt any gameplay even if it was a disconnect. if they reconnect, someone would have been playign their hero and gotten them a kill. worst case scenario, they would have suffered one, maybe 2 deaths by the time thye can reconnect. not a bad penalty IMHO.


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Achenar

Senior Member

09-02-2009

Maybe not by a summoner, because that kind of defeats the base mechanic of the game, but perhaps make them a medium-difficulty bot?


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Thistledown

Junior Member

09-03-2009

If it was made into a bot, it would be much more likely to feed than sitting at base.


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Undefined

Recruiter

09-03-2009

Quote:
Thistledown:
If it was made into a bot, it would be much more likely to feed than sitting at base.


agree~ we need direct control of the unit .


1