Welcome to the Forum Archive!

Years of conversation fill a ton of digital pages, and we've kept all of it accessible to browse or copy over. Whether you're looking for reveal articles for older champions, or the first time that Rammus rolled into an "OK" thread, or anything in between, you can find it here. When you're finished, check out the boards to join in the latest League of Legends discussions.

GO TO BOARDS


Riot, reword Warwick's Q, the current wording is dumb

Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

RedTruth

Senior Member

03-11-2013

Quote:
hashinshin:
Warwick could use this change...

except with 1.0 flat AD added to his Q.

What change, he just switched the words around to make it look more appealing...


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

AIexanderNW

Member

03-11-2013

Why? I like the original version more


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

SonOfTheDevil

Senior Member

03-11-2013

But it shall delay Karma Relaunch for a few seconds D:


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Bouncing Beauty

Member

03-11-2013

Quote:
Tökës:
This post is not very well thought out for 2 reasons.
1. The reason the ability is worded that way because given the situation, either of the two ratios could be the lesser value. Saying a minimum of (75 / 125 / 175 / 225 / 275 (+100% of ability power) doesn't sound very smart if the health percentage value is lower...
2. The flat health percentage that this ability has does not have an ability power scaling, it's only flat health.


How do you not see that they do the SAME THING.

lolhedeletedhispost


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Noric

Senior Member

03-11-2013

Prefer the new wording.


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

cycIohexane

Senior Member

03-11-2013

In case you didn't know.....

Warwick's Q currently hits for the GREATER VALUE between percent of max health and AP.

In the reworded description you combined the values. I'm all for changing warwick to make him more viable, but this is overboard.


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Bouncing Beauty

Member

03-11-2013

Quote:
xxXJudasXxx:
In case you didn't know.....

Warwick's Q currently hits for the GREATER VALUE between percent of max health and AP.

In the reworded description you combined the values. I'm all for changing warwick to make him more viable, but this is overboard.

Ok. Only gonna explain this ONCE.

It does % damage at rank 1 if %hp is more than flatdamage(75).
IT CAN'T DO LESS THAN 75, SO 75 IS A MINIMUM.

Quote:
if (%hp >= flatdamage)
%damage
else
flatdamage


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

DemonHound

Senior Member

03-11-2013

you're expecting GD to know how to read? op, pls.


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Stashty

Senior Member

03-11-2013

This is actually hilarious, these people getting so defensive over rearranging words. Nothing was changed people, stop trying to be smarter than OP because you're failing miserably.


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Bouncing Beauty

Member

03-11-2013

Quote:
DemonHound:
you're expecting GD to know how to read? op, pls.

I apparently expected too much.