Welcome to the Forum Archive!

Years of conversation fill a ton of digital pages, and we've kept all of it accessible to browse or copy over. Whether you're looking for reveal articles for older champions, or the first time that Rammus rolled into an "OK" thread, or anything in between, you can find it here. When you're finished, check out the boards to join in the latest League of Legends discussions.

GO TO BOARDS


@Lyte Tribunal has become too lenient again

Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Enterti

Senior Member

02-04-2013

Thank you again Lyte. I would love to have a game with you sometime if you are interested.


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

iMRts

Senior Member

02-15-2013

.


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

SqueezeMeGently

Member

03-16-2013

Quote:
Lyte:
Actually, this is a special case.

When a case has majority or higher vote to punish but has "None" under punishment, it actually means our special Player Support teams intervened on the case and punished the player before the Tribunal case closed.

In many cases, players like these are permanently banned by Player Support before the Tribunal case closes, so when the Tribunal case closes the punishment is "None" because no Tribunal punishment was applied. We have a tweak planned to make these cases more understandable in the future.


It'd be nice if there 'special' teams ever did anything to help players, rather than make sure the hammer comes down where it already is.