Welcome to the Forum Archive!

Years of conversation fill a ton of digital pages, and we've kept all of it accessible to browse or copy over. Whether you're looking for reveal articles for older champions, or the first time that Rammus rolled into an "OK" thread, or anything in between, you can find it here. When you're finished, check out the boards to join in the latest League of Legends discussions.

GO TO BOARDS


If someone doesn't vote during a surrender, please default it to "Yes".

Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Uccisore

Senior Member

10-20-2010

Seems good to me. If they aren't voting it's because they either aren't there, they're too stupid/ don't understand English to know what it means, or they're trying to stall the vote to harass people.


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Busty Demoness

Recruiter

10-20-2010

I agree that a "timed out" vote should count as an agreement to surrender.


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Busty Demoness

Recruiter

10-20-2010

Or, at the very least, do not count it towards the vote ratio, so a 3/1 with an AFK 5th player would count as a surrender.


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Skorp

Recruiter

10-20-2010

If a player is spamming surrender votes, I sometimes move the surrender box off the screen so it doesn't pop up in the middle of a teamfight and mess me up.

I believe that if a player has ragequit it shows 2 messages ("Ragedude has left the game", "Ragedude has quit&quot and you now only need 3 votes for a surrender to succeed. Whereas if their internet DCs for whatever reason the surrender votes will time out and their vote will be counted as a no.

If they implement your suggestion, I'd like a menu option "Always vote no for surrenders if I'm active and the vote times out".


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Simon Zhao

Senior Member

10-20-2010

ok

/rammus

and yeah, good idea ^^


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

edgtrv

Senior Member

10-20-2010

If we're surrendering and I vote yes but we lose then I play the rest of the game to the best of my ability.


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

kUnjU

Recruiter

10-20-2010

Quote:
Oaksheri:
No.

Don't assume everyone agrees with your cowardly ass.


^this


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

edgtrv

Senior Member

10-20-2010

Quote:
kUnjU:
^this



Then vote no. Reading comprehension! YAY!


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Rogmarz

Member

10-20-2010

Umm, no. Sometimes there's a legitimate reason to wait on the Surrender option, considering it has a timer. Defaulting to Yes is a poor decision and makes little logical sense.


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Uccisore

Senior Member

10-20-2010

Quote:
Rogmarz:
Umm, no. Sometimes there's a legitimate reason to wait on the Surrender option, considering it has a timer. Defaulting to Yes is a poor decision and makes little logical sense.


Why is defaulting to 'No' more logical? I mean, it has to be one or the other.