Input: Fix Matchmaking and the Trolls.

12
Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

HonorTheCode

Junior Member

01-04-2013

Thank you all for your input. I understand why some of these options may not be viable. I also understand that getting out of ELo "hell" is based on chance. That chance is weather or not you get an individual who is serious about the role they play. Please continue with your ideas and comments.


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

The 1011

Junior Member

01-04-2013

When you start out playing a team game in school usually there is 2 captains and they choose who is on their team. First you choose in your profile who you play and where you main position you have 5 champions and your secondaries you get up to 2-3 and the option to not play certain lanes like bot mid or jungle.
Then next concept except at the start of the banning process you would see what everyone likes to play, and ban from there then the picking process would be the same from there except the captain would pick who is on their team maybe the captain would pick someone that is willing to plays as a support, over someone that only plays top and mid.
If only certain people have certain champions in their profile how will that change the bans or even the meta? The captain would have more risk and more rewards from winning and also more penalty from losing compared to the non-captains.

This a Concept of ranked solo-queue I have sort of meshed with dodge ball or any backyard game i have played like capture the flag


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

KlunkTheSpaceCat

Member

01-04-2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by HonorTheCode View Post
Some viable options would be to allow a que system. IE let players que for certain positions that they want to play before had to alleviate the argument in the chat room.
Role Based Queue, you say? Right this way, my good man! We've got a thread for that. =]


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Ballzofire

Senior Member

01-04-2013

No ty on the Queue for a role plz. If we wanna double jungle. Shouldn't we be allowed to do so? Riot is constantly making it so champions can fulfill different roles depending on their builds. So why hinder what they are trying to accomplish with a queue system that pretty much dictates roles? Creativity makes this game fun. If there wasnt that kind of "freedom" to do what u want. Then this would just an overworked game of chess. Same pieces every time. No fun.

I completly agree with minimum wins for ranked. Thats just a no brainer.


I suggest that riot just states out to the public that calls mean ****, and pick order wins. Make a BIG deal about it too. Front page the LoL site with this information. There is a reason that regs/draft are random. So you have the chance to first pick that kat or whoever u wanna play. Then the next game u may be last. Deal with the system already in place and its GG from there. Maybe more people will dodge queues, but that's ok you prolly don't wanna team with them and their bad attitude anyways.

Just my 2 cents


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Knockes

Senior Member

01-17-2013

There's no such thing as "ELO Hell"...
If you can't carry, you are not significantly better than your teammates. I've learned from experience that going 23/4/7 does not mean you are a good player, it means that you got fed and are ahead of the enemy team. If you can't be a possitive leader and utilize your team's abilities to win the game, you are not as "good" as you want to think.


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

PogoPogoPogoPogo

Senior Member

12