Welcome to the Forum Archive!

Years of conversation fill a ton of digital pages, and we've kept all of it accessible to browse or copy over. Whether you're looking for reveal articles for older champions, or the first time that Rammus rolled into an "OK" thread, or anything in between, you can find it here. When you're finished, check out the boards to join in the latest League of Legends discussions.

GO TO BOARDS


Lack of underboob in champions/skins

12
Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

ColonelTbaggs

Junior Member

12-15-2012

Yeah, lets add more sacks because *thats* what sells more skins. It's not even the same thing... If you want equivalency there, then ask for more shirtless guys.

You only think balls are the same thing because you still think boobs are a big deal. Last I looked, men have nipples too ya know. I don't hear anyone of you complaining about Varus, Lee sin, or Ryze's, lack of a shirt and how it "affects their ability to do battle" or how they need to "cover those things up". Seriously, deal with it.

They are nice to look at, are the only thing that make some characters worth purchasing (yes, I said it), and are still not a big deal.

More underboobery, no sacks. Need to get a poll up here.


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

KahIeesi

Senior Member

12-18-2012

Quote:
ColonelTbaggs:
Yeah, lets add more sacks because *thats* what sells more skins. It's not even the same thing... If you want equivalency there, then ask for more shirtless guys.

You only think balls are the same thing because you still think boobs are a big deal. Last I looked, men have nipples too ya know. I don't hear anyone of you complaining about Varus, Lee sin, or Ryze's, lack of a shirt and how it "affects their ability to do battle" or how they need to "cover those things up". Seriously, deal with it.

They are nice to look at, are the only thing that make some characters worth purchasing (yes, I said it), and are still not a big deal.

More underboobery, no sacks. Need to get a poll up here.



Of course no sacks! wouldn't want you to be exposed to something you don't want to see. Have you ever seen boxing or mma or any type of fighting? Guys fight with their shirts off. in real life. Seeing a shirtless guy is not a big deal because guys spend a lot of time shirtless anyways. What you don't see however, is their sacks. Kind of like you don't see underboob anywhere in the real world apart from porn pics or websites. I'm not driven to buy a character because 'oh he's sexy because he's not wearing a shirt,' it's not a big deal to me but apparently it's a big deal to you since you're taking the time to complain about how not enough *** is shown in this game (which is a completely ridiculous thing to even try to say.)

If youw ant to see something sexy you can go on over to redtube. this game was not made to turn you on.


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Emberlash

Junior Member

01-16-2013

Sacks are weak. ******s can take a pounding, get more of those in there


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Bioness

Senior Member

01-16-2013

Yeah because the current female characters aren't already nude enough.

Who do you think they are Tier Harribel?


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Plaidiator

Member

01-17-2013

Quote:
Candidumbra:
I think it's actually time we get some females who are dressed for the occasion: a vicious, bloody battle in which swords, knives, and various projectiles will be coming at them.

In other words, practical armor and clothing that fits the role. I'm not against the idea of a bit of sexappeal here and there, in a game with this many characters you should keep it diverse. But right now the female champs aren't diverse at all, they're almost exclusively "sexy". Needs more of the other side of the spectrum.

yes that would be awesome!
It is why i picked iron solari skin over valkyrie. iron solari looks hardcore and like she could actually take some hits and be a tank!


12