The Inherent Problem

123
Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Geokhan

This user has referred a friend to League of Legends, click for more information

Senior Member

10-16-2012

That is harassment. Different from arguing.

Arguing I wouldn't punish as long as it is done in the proper place. We need to have a little bit of this. When we ask others to look at our RP and they feel strongly about it, there is bound to be a debate. GarenxKat I would argue about. ALL DAY LONG. Same with placing an alignment on Morgana and Kayle. As a matter of fact, I HAVE argued with people about it. I feel better for it. Not cause they listened to me, cause they didn't, but because I learned about their side of it and could better understand their reasoning. I don't totally agree, but I could understand it better.

Harassment (Which I have yet to TRULY see here.....unless you count Unexisted, which I don't) has no place anywhere and deserves the full fury of Riot to crash down upon their accounts.


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Ask the Megling

Senior Member

10-16-2012

Quote:
Originally Posted by TotemsTea View Post
Viktor, I honestly don't know if you're trolling or not. The problem I am trying to address has nothing to do with atomic bombs, or even (actually related to the boards) if you or anyone else approves of another's roleplay.
Okay, I don't like to perpetuate arguments and whatnot, but I'm going to have to call you on this one. He was using nuclear weapons as a historical reference to get his point across. He was saying that it's not necessarily a good thing if people don't speak up about something. It's a perfectly valid point.


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Geokhan

This user has referred a friend to League of Legends, click for more information

Senior Member

10-16-2012

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ask the Megling View Post
Okay, I don't like to perpetuate arguments and whatnot, but I'm going to have to call you on this one. He was using nuclear weapons as a historical reference to get his point across. He was saying that it's not necessarily a good thing if people don't speak up about something. It's a perfectly valid point.

The idea I agree with, the reference maybe not. I think mutual destruction was a bit more of a deterrent.


123