Welcome to the Forum Archive!

Years of conversation fill a ton of digital pages, and we've kept all of it accessible to browse or copy over. Whether you're looking for reveal articles for older champions, or the first time that Rammus rolled into an "OK" thread, or anything in between, you can find it here. When you're finished, check out the boards to join in the latest League of Legends discussions.

GO TO BOARDS


"It was controversial" Time Bans.....

12
Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

Ulanopo

Recruiter

08-07-2012

Quote:
Kagami:
the false positive rate for the tribunal is .5%, so odds of being that rather low.


Actually, what they consider a "false positive" is where the punishment doesn't fit the crime. They said that the "true" failure rate is actually much, much smaller than that.


Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.

DebosBike

Senior Member

08-07-2012

Quote:
Ulanopo:
Actually, what they consider a "false positive" is where the punishment doesn't fit the crime. They said that the "true" failure rate is actually much, much smaller than that.


This is true.

The .5% figure that you are being given is mostly cases where they felt that the offender was assigned a punishment that was too harsh and it was either removed if they had been banned for a bit already or reduced for the remaining duration.

People actually being banned without violating any rules is actually incredibly rare, they have even had numerous people in the past TRY to get themselves banned falsely and failed. One guy even had premade groups with various friends and had both his friends and the other team report him for countless games and he still couldn't get banned.


12