Today in game, I bumped into TheInfamousDrK (a longtime player of League of Legends, who I believe I've seen a few times since I started playing in 2010).
Here's the story.
We ran Riven top (memememememe!), Katarina mid, Master Yi jungle, and AP Sion/Caitlyn kill lane bot.
They ran GP top, Brand mid, Mundo jungle, and Teemo (DrK was playing this) + Nidalee.
DrK made a claim that I found interesting. Supposedly, Cait had critted her level 1 for around 400 damage. Then she proceeded to claim that she was suspicious and took a look (through a "light hack") at Cait's packet.exe files. Inside, she said that she discovered that Cait's "crit rating setting was set to 400%," and thus, Caitlyn was hacking to gain an unfair advantage.
Here's where I started to get a little dubious of the whole thing: she claimed that her husband was a techie at Riot Games. If he is, then I accept defeat and will wait to see what happens in the end. But I would like to present a counterargument to the accusation of hacking.
A bit of theory crafting here:
(note that I do not factor in damage reduction due to armor)
Let's say we have a Caitlyn level 1, running all flat AD runes and crit chance runes.
© 2013 Riot Games, Inc. All rights reserved. Riot Games, League of Legends and PvP.net are trademarks, services marks, or registered trademarks of Riot Games, Inc.